Category Archives: Pain

DEA Bullying Denies Relief to Those With Chronic Pain

By Bob Aronson

morphine is the best medicine 

I suffer from Chronic Pain and do millions of others and it’s getting more and more difficult to get any relief from it because two federal agencies are bullying physicians.

My neck and shoulder pain started after my heart transplant and some of it was directly related to the position of my arms while I was in surgery.  Many transplant recipients suffer the same fate, but transplant or not if a person is in pain relief should be no farther away than your doctor’s office.  It’s not!

I have received dozens of messages from pain sufferers since I published the previous two posts on the subject of chronic pain and physicians who simply will not prescribe narcotics (1. Why You Can’t Get Pain Meds   and (2. Suffering from Chronic Pain? Here’s what you need to know and that’s what prompted me to write this third blog on the subject. I’m angry, frustrated and helpless.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) mission (more on that later)dea badge is essentially to stop the production and sale of illegal drugs in America. Their “War on Drugs” is well known and it has recently expanded from the poppy fields to the practice of medicine and to pharmacies. 

A few years ago Florida was the state of the “Pill Mills,” places where almost anyone could get powerful prescription pain killers just by showing up at the Doctor’s office. So flagrant were the violations that the DEA had a pill mill 2heyday of arrests and convictions but like many federal agencies they didn’t know when to stop.  Not satisfied with putting the “Pill Mill” docs out of business, they turned to the regular physicians and warned them of investigations and loss of license if they were found to be prescribing narcotic pain meds to people who weren’t in pain.

Many physicians who saw the DEA overreaction to the “Pill Mills” overreacted themselves and decided not to prescribe opioids (narcotics or controlled substances) to anyone.  The result is that many who suffer from chronic pain that cannot be relieved by anything other than narcotics can’t get them and are suffering needlessly.

How chilling is the DEA’s action.  Try this on for size.  44% of American doctors confess that a fear of a police or DEA investigation into their practice influenced the way that they prescribed medications to chronic pain patients. This according to a poll of doctors for the Center for Addiction and Substance Abuse.

The DEA’s actions are harming patients and maybe it is because their mission is the most convoluted, overly broad, confusing detailed mess you’ll ever see. 

Here are three of examples of Mission Statement excellence

  • TED: Spreading Ideas. (2 words)
  • Smithsonian: The increase and diffusion of knowledge. (6 words)
  • USO lifts the spirits of America’s troops and their families. (9 words)
  • DEA (347 words)

(This is only part of it you can see the rest at

The mission of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is to enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States and bring to the criminal and civil justice system of the United States, or any other competent jurisdiction, those organizations and principal members of organizations, involved in the gDEA arrestrowing, manufacture, or distribution of controlled substances appearing in or destined for illicit traffic in the United States; and to recommend and support non-enforcement programs aimed at reducing the availability of illicit controlled substances on the domestic and international markets.

They wrote a mission statement that sets them up to invade anyone at any time for any reason.  If they were legitimately concerned with stopping the flow of illegal drugs their mission statement probably could have said. “The Mission of the DEA is to stop the production and sale of illegal drugs in the United States” (19 words).  Instead, they chose to write a book that gives them the authority to assume more authority.

Essentially what the DEA is talking about is Opioids so let’s start with a definition. opioids What is an Opioid?  According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse opioids are medications that relieve pain. They reduce the intensity of pain signals reaching the brain and affect those brain areas controlling emotion, which diminishes the effects of a painful stimulus.

Medications that fall within this class include hydrocodone (e.g., Vicodin), oxycodone (e.g., Oxycontin, Percocet), morphine (e.g., Kadian, Avinza), codeine, and related drugs. Hydrocodone products are the most commonly prescribed for a variety of painful conditions, including dental and injury-related pain. Morphine is often used before and after surgical procedures to alleviate severe pain. Codeine, on the other hand, is often prescribed for mild pain. In addition to their pain relieving properties, some of these drugs—codeine and diphenoxylate (Lomotil) for example—can be used to relieve coughs and severe diarrhea.

pain cartoonIn their zeal to accomplish the impossible mission the DEA has now ventured into the practice of medicine a discipline for which they are not qualified nor are they welcome.  As a result, thousands upon thousands of Americans are suffering incredible pain.  They can’t get relief because their physicians have been intimidated by the DEA and to a lesser degree the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  We have here a sort of medical paradox, the feds want to practice medicine and the medical doctors are afraid to. 

This report from the Reuters news agency pretty much sums up the way many physicians are reacting to DEA’s bullying: “Many physicians have increased patient monitoring, which means more urine tests, more documentation, and more frequent “pill count” checks, where patients must go to the prescriber’s office with their pill bottles to prove they have not sold or misused their medication.

“Every hour of the day I have concerns I’ll be audited, that my ability to take care of my patients and my family can be taken away, and I’m as legitimate as you can get,” said one frazzled physicianprescriber who has a private orthopedic practice in Florida. “You’re constantly watching over your shoulder and it takes a toll,” he told Reuters news.

Safety and security are one thing but when a law enforcement agency decides to run rampant over a legitimate segment of the private sector, someone, somewhere ought to stand up and take notice.

In their long but terribly unsuccessful effort to control illegal drugs the DEA has now focused their attention on prescription drugs and in particular those few physicians (most of them were in Florida) who wrote narcotics prescriptions for nearly anyone who wanted them.  And…they’ve been successful. Most of the pill mills are gone, babrams tankut the DEA is like a runaway Abrams tank and is now rumbling over the medical profession.

In typical federal overreaction to the “Pill Mill” crisis, the DEA decided to crack down on all physicians by letting them know that they were being watched and that they had better be damned sure they were prescribing narcotics for real pain and not to junkies.

The overreaction by the Feds was met by an equal overreaction by many physicians.  They just quit prescribing opioid (narcotic) pain meds because they don’t want the hassle. Both the feds and the docs seem to have forgotten us patients.  We are the ones who get the short, sharp, infected end of the stick.

Not satisfied with their efforts, but impressed with their nearly effortless intimidation of the medical profession the DEA then decided that while they concentrated on powerful narcotics like oxycontin and oxycodone the effort should not stop there.  They also bullying imagewanted restrictions on a lower level of painkillers as well so they crossed the street and bullied the FDA into telling docs they had better be careful when they prescribe Vicodin and Lortabs.  Both contain hydrocodone and are usually combined with over the counter analgesics like aspirin or Tylenol.

The result?  If you suffer from chronic pain you are going to have a very difficult time getting any drug containing a narcotic or other controlled substance.  The medical profession has been scared to cause many docs to refuse to prescribe narcotics or any other controlled substance including drugs like Valium which is non-narcotic but still a controlled substance.

Many so-called “Pain Clinics” will not prescribe narcotics at all for any reason. Instead they will look for “root causes” and try a raft of anti-inflammatory and other treatments.  And, to be fair, in some cases those “other treatments” work, but while the pain experts are searching for non-opioid solutions, the patient suffers. I know I’m one of them.  When I asked one pain clinic doc for narcotics after repeated failed attempts to control my pain he said,”I can’t do that, see your primary.”  The “can’t” part of the answer is pure BS.  Won’t is the correct word to use — won’t because he has been intimidated by the feds.  I endured weeks of agonizing, debilitating pain because they refused to prescribe narcotics even though nothing else was working.

There are some docs who have the courage to practice medicine despite thewe are watching you fact that two powerful federal agencies are threatening them with a minimum of being investigated and a maximum of license revocation.  Physicians feel as though they are constantly being watched.

My primary care doc understands that I really do suffer from chronic pain and that I have tried other approaches that have failed.  Despite that, to protect his license he monitors my use of the Oxycodone he prescribes very carefully.  He requires that once a month, when it is time for a prescription refill he sees me in his office where he reviews my case, questions me about my pain level and then reminds me of the dangers of opioids even though I have never sought an increase in dosage and am not an addict.. 

I still believe that while the DEA and the FDA are being heavy handed, physicians who are licensed to practice medicine and fail to prescribe drugs that have been proven to be effective must bear some of the responsibility for the suffering many chronic pain patients are experiencing.  

eyes in the darkReminiscent of so many tyrannical regimes the DEA absolves itself of any responsibility for the suffering they have caused among patients with chronic pain.  Here’s what they told The National Pain Report.  

“The agency is not trying to limit access to opioid painkillers. And if legitimate pain medication prescriptions are not being written or filled, it’s the fault of doctors and pharmacists, not the government,” said DEA spokesman Rusty Payne. 

“We’re not doctors. We’re regulators and enforcers of the law. If something is prescribed for a legitimate medical purpose, we’re certainly not going to get in the way.  If a pharmacy chooses not to fill a prescription for someone, that’s their decision. It’s not the DEA’s decision,” he said.

To me that’s a whole lot like a cop stopping you for no good reason, warning you about speeding and then telling you that he and other cops are watching you very carefully to be sure you abide by all the rules.  Then, if due to fear you just quit driving they say, “That was his choice, we didn’t tell him to stop driving.”

So our bottom line is this. If you have chronic pain and all the non-narcotic remedies don’t work you are going to have to grin and bear it for a while.  No physician in this environment is going to write opioid prescription for someone who walks in from the street complaining of pain.  You are going to have to prove it.  Your chances of getting relief maybe better from your primary care physician but bring evidence of your pain

  • X-rays, MRIs, CT scans
  •  Written diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and instructions from other physicians or emergency departments
  •  Prescription records
  •  Police or other reports if you’ve had an injury
  • Reports from physical therapists or Chiropractors
  • Anything else that will help prove your claim that you have chronic pain and that opioids may be your only relief.

If you want a primary care physician to help you, it is going to take a little time to build a relationship and he or she may even want you to repeat some tests you have already undergone.  Be prepared to hurt for a while because it is unlikely that any physician you have not seen before will prescribe a narcotic pain killer after only one or two appointments.  That’s what our friends at DEA have done for us.

If all of this really gets under your skin, call, write, email, text, holler at or visit your Congressional Representative, Your Senator and/or The President of the United States.


bob minus Jay full shotBob Aronson is a 2007 heart transplant recipient, the founder and primary author of the blogs on this site and the founder of Facebook’s over 3,000 member Organ Transplant Initiative group.

Now retired and living in Jacksonville, Florida with his wife Robin he spends his time advocating for patients with end stage diseases and for organ recipients.  He is also active in helping his wife with her art business at art festivals and on her Rockin Robin Prints site on Etsy. 

Bob is a former journalist, Governor’s Communication Director and international communications consultant.



Got Chronic Pain & Can’t Get Pain Meds? Here’s What You Need to Know

By Bob Aronson

pain from the spouse pount of view

Chronic pain is of major interest to me because I suffer from it and have been denied treatment as well.  I have an established record as a sufferer and one who has tried a wide range of alternatives to the “controlled substances” the medical profession is so reluctant to prescribe.  I understand that we have a serious addiction problem in this country and that a very tiny minority of physicians over-prescribe controlled substances like Vicodin and Oxycodone.

I also understand that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration  (FDA) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are cracking down hard on this activity but in the process are intimidating the entire medical profession in order to rout out the few who recklessly dispense narcotics to nearly anyone who wants them.  I know from first-hand experience and from the testimony of others that many physicians are so intimidated they refuse to prescribe pain killing narcotics to anyone.  I get all that and outline it in detail in this post.

Conversely, I believe that physicians have a unique opportunity and even an ethical responsibility to act as patient advocates rather than to retreat under fire and refuse treatment to those with legitimate pain issues.  The oath that says, Hipocrates“First, do no harm,” is broken any time relief is available but refused not because there is evidence that the patient is being dishonest but because the physician fears investigation. That to me is unconscionable and a terrible disservice to patients. Too many doctors at too many institutions have been intimidated by the threat of investigation and it is patients in pain who suffer as a result.

The publication, Scientific American  says this of chronic pain:  “Anyone living with chronic pain knows that it amounts to much more than an unpleasant bodily sensation. Fuzzy thinking, faulty memory, anxiety and depression chronic pain graphicoften accompany long-term pain, suggesting that the condition is more of a whole-brain disorder than simply pain signaling gone haywire. New research from Northwestern University reveals a possible cause: an impaired hippocampus, a region critical for learning, memory and emotional processing (you can read more by clicking on this link)

While chronic pain is a recognized medical condition that often can only be treated with controlled substances it is becoming more and more difficult to find physicians who will prescribe them.  The reasons? Abuse, misuse, suicides, crime, greed and among physicians fear and intimidation.

On October 24, 2013 this headline greeted readers when they picked up their morning paper; FDA Crackdowns on Painkiller DrugsThe move was prompted by one drug in particular — Hydrocodone otherwise known as Vicodin the highly addictive painkiller that has grown into the most widely prescribed drug in the U.S.

vicodinIn a major policy shift, the agency said in an online notice that hydrocodone containing drugs should be subject to the same restrictions as other narcotic drugs like oxycodone and morphine.  What this means is that the regulating agencies first made it difficult to get the major pain killers and now are restricting lesser ones as well.  The question is where will it stop and how will chronic pain sufferers be affected? History tells us that actions like this will cause fewer prescriptions to be written but that many patients who legitimately need these drugs will be caught up in the dragnet and lose their relief.

The latest move comes more than a decade after the Drug Enforcement Administration first asked the FDA to reclassify hydrocodone so that it would be subject to the same restrictions as other addictive painkilling drugs.


Florida is or was at the epicenter of an explosion in narcotics prescriptions written by unscrupulous physicians who provided narcotics to almost anyone for exorbitant prices.  Pharmacies were caught playing the game with these docs and while the action by the feds reduced the number of pill mills, it also caused great agony for those who suffer from chronic pain and could no longer get relief. (

I will return to the legal and ethical conundrums faced by physicians and pharmacists shortly but let’s step back for just a moment or two to look at the human side.  The millions of people who suffer from chronic pain and who depend on controlled substances to provide them with some semblance of human life…and I’m one of them.

American pain foundationThe American Pain Foundation says that chronic pain is a complex condition that affects almost 50 million Americans.  Even after decades of research, chronic pain remains poorly understood and hard to control.

Chronic pain can be severe, so severe it has driven some to take their own lives.  It is a major problem and often even the most potent of pain killers has only a minimal effect.  Here’s how two patients describe their daily battle with chronic pain.

“It feels as though someone has stuck a white hot poker into the bones at the top of my spine and the base of my neck.  The pain radiates to both shoulders and down my back. I cannot stand without help and cannot sit in any one position for very long.  Turning my head is too painful to even contemplate.  Like a master torturer the pain seems to know just where to attack next to make me confess and confess I would – to anything at all if it would just go away for a few minutes.”  That’s the testimony of a Frank R. a Michigan man suffering from chronic pain brought on by osteoarthritis.

In the state of Virginia Mary T. says this. “It is my lower back and both of my legs.  The pain is not intense it is beyond that and it is unrelenting.   Sometimes I am so tired out from battling pain all night I will just sit and cry but the pain monster takes no pity.  I cannot walk without support, so now I have a cane which helps me get around but the pain doesn’t want me to walk and has begun attacking the arm and hand I use to hold the cane.  Death would be a relief; I can’t go on living like this.”

Frank and Mary are fairly typical chronic pain sufferers.  Both take narcotics to manage the pain neither gets much relief anymore because of building high tolerances for opiates.  Both have tried almost everything modern medicine has to offer and narcotics are all that is left to help them but because tolerances go up, one is forced to take more and more of the narcotic until finally the pain subsides – it doesn’t go away it just backs off for a while but the massive doses of narcotics can leave the patient in an almost Zombie like state, unable to concentrate or focus on any task and sleepy, so sleepy that some days patients don’t bother to get out of bed.  The result is that while the pain may be minimized so is the patient’s quality of life.

A survey by the American Academy of Pain Medicine found that even comprehensive treatment with painkilling prescription drugs helps, on average, only about 58% of people with chronic pain.  

What causes chronic pain, and what can you do about it?

Some cases of chronic pain can be traced to a specific injury that has long since healed. Other cases have no apparent cause — no prior injury and an absence of underlying tissue damage. However, many cases of chronic pain are related to these conditions:

  • Low back pain
  • Arthritis, especially osteoarthritis
  • Headache
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Shingles
  • Nerve damage (neuropathy)

Treating your underlying condition is important. But often that does not resolve the pain issue.  Increasingly, doctors consider chronic pain a condition of its own, requiring pain treatment that addresses the patient’s physical and psychological health.

Chronic pain can leave a person almost unable to function and the medical profession doesn’t seem to know what to do about it because they are getting mixed messages from state and federal governments. 

On one hand government says, ”Treat the patient, give them what they need to manage pain,” and on the other the Feds in particular are saying, “There are too many greedy quacks out there handing out narcotics like Pez dispensers and it has to stop.”  Here’s why:

centers for disease controlEarlier this year the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that prescription painkiller overdose deaths among women increased about fivefold between 1999 and 2010. Among men, such deaths rose about 3.5-fold. The rise in both death rates is closely tied to a boom in the overall use of prescribed painkillers. 

The result is that many major medical centers are playing it safe and prescribing narcotics for short term relief following surgeries and a few other specific situations like terminal cancer victims but otherwise are telling patients to see their primary physician for pain relief.  The reason cited by many medical centers is that the laws are incredibly complex and therefore vague. For example, here’s just a short section of New York law (you can read all of it here

License. Only practitioners who are properly licensed and registered may issue a prescription for a controlled substance. Section 80.64 contains the full information about who may issue controlled substances.

Purpose of a Prescription. A prescription is the instrument to legalize an ultimate user’s possession of a controlled substance. To be effective then, a controlled substance prescription should be issued for legitimate medical purposes only. Section 80.65 contains the full text.

Initial and Corresponding Responsibilities: Prescriber and Pharmacist. The responsibility for the proper prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances is on the physician, dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian, or other authorized practitioner, but a corresponding liability rests with the pharmacist who fills the prescription.

A practitioner cannot supply prescriptions to maintain an addict or habitual user of controlled substances. There are some exceptions and practitioners should read the New York law very carefully. An order purporting to be a prescription issued to an addict or habitual user of controlled substances not in the course of professional treatment but for the purpose of providing the user with narcotics or other controlled substances sufficient to keep him or her comfortable by maintaining his or her customary use is not a prescription within the meaning of New York law.

It is no wonder physicians are reluctant to prescribe opiates, they fear losing their licenses.  In the preceding paragraph physicians are told they cannot provide controlled substances to addicts or habitual users but many people with chronic pain ARE habitual users and they may be addicted as well, and the New York law could easily be interpreted to read that prescribing controlled substances to chronic pain sufferers is a violation of the law.

In a document with the unwieldy title of; Use, Abuse, Misuses, and Disposal of Prescription Pain Medication Time Tool Clinical Referenceamerican college of preventive medicineThe American College of Preventive Medicine (ACPM) states its position on the patient’s right to pain relief very clearly but the issue gets clouded in the “Challenges” section.  It is easy to see why many physicians find it easier to “pass the buck” by saying, “See your primary care physician for narcotics,” or, “See a physician who specializes in pain for treatment with controlled substances (for the full transcript and more click on this link:


Adequate pain control is a fundamental right of every patient [1]. A consensus statement from 21 Health Organizations and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) conclude that “Effective pain management is an integral and important aspect of quality medical care, and pain should be treated aggressively… Preventing drug abuse is an important societal goal, but it should not hinder patients’ ability to receive the care they need and deserve.” [2]

The consequences of not treating pain are significant [1] [3] and confer a tremendous economic impact [4]. Post-surgical pain increases heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, and circulating catecholamines, placing patients at risk of heart attack, stroke, bleeding, and other complications. Unrelieved acute pain often evolves into chronic pain syndromes, which are linked to a constellation of maladaptive physiological, psychological, family, and social consequences that result in:

  • ·        Reduced mobility; loss of strength
  • ·        Disturbed sleep
  • ·        Decreased healing due to immune system impairment
  • ·        Increased susceptibility to disease
  • ·        Dependence on medication
  • ·        Codependence with family members or care givers
  • ·        Psychological ramifications (depression, anxiety, social withdrawal)
  • ·        Slower return to function
  • ·        Decreased quality of life


  • Physicians are currently challenged to deal with the “perfect storm”—a confluence of pain control versus risk of misuse and abuse of prescription medications [5].
  • This perfect storm is co-incident with the more general rise in unintended overdose deaths that may have resulted from aggressive efforts to have physicians treat pain without the education, skill and resources to manage the physiological and psychological complications that can arise when treating a patient for a chronic pain condition. Physicians must be able to safely and effectively prescribe scheduled drugs and, at the same time, must identify and manage misuse and abuse in their practices [6]. Ethics drive physicians to prescribe, but fear of sanctions may affect physician prescribing behaviors, which might compromise quality of care. The problem cannot be ignored because abusers often face complications, such as: [7]
    • ·        Overdoses
    • ·        Addiction and dependence
    • ·        Adverse effects
    • ·        Social and family dysfunction
    • ·        Criminal consequences

The universal challenge is to adequately control pain, having a variety of etiologies, in an environment where evidenced-based medicine is lacking or in conflict, while identifying and managing high risk situations, and possibly treating addictions resulting from initial pain control efforts. Physicians confront the dilemma of balancing pain relief against the reality that some patients may misuse and divert these medications. The scale weighs public health priorities against individual pain and suffering [8].

Some physicians are so nervous about prescribing painkillers that they just flat out refuse to do so. I had it happen to me at of all places a well-known pain clinic.  These physicians fail to recognize chronic pain for what it is and want to find the underlying condition that causes the pain but the fact is the pain is the underlying condition.

J. Donald Schumacher President and CEO of the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization says, “According to a recent report from the Institute of Medicine, chronic pain itself can be the problem. Such pain can cause changes in the nervous system that worsen over time — even after the original source of the pain has gone away.

Because many doctors are not properly trained in the study of chronic pain, patients often suffer unnecessarily. One study of nursing home residents with chronic pain found that 44 percent were not getting any treatment at all.

In some cases, the need for pain treatment may not be obvious. Older patients, especially those with dementia, often struggle to communicate their needs.

Yet according to a report from the Hartford Institute of Geriatric Nursing at New York University, the burden to communicate with patients who may be in pain does not rest with the patients. Clinicians must take on that duty. They can do so by learning to identify non-verbal behaviors, such as “agitation, restlessness, aggression, and combativeness,” which “are often an expression of unmet needs.”

Old age must not become an excuse for the failure to pursue effective treatment for pain.

Of course, patients must assume some responsibility for treating their pain, too. Approximately 50 percent of patients do not take their medication as prescribed. Many mistakenly wait for pain to recur before administering another dose. Such on-again, off-again treatment just results in cycles of pain — rather than preventing it altogether by maintaining adequate levels of medication in the bloodstream.”

Schumacher also believes this, “Whatever the condition causing the pain, the person best equipped to take the lead in finding the proper treatment is the sufferer. People know their own bodies, and they can judge when medications are inducing unwanted side-effects.

No one deserves to be incapacitated by chronic pain. The means to alleviate it are available. All that’s required is the will to find the right treatment.”

So what else can patients do to get relief when the system seems obsessed with denying it?

In a Web MD Story, Rollin M. Gallagher, MD, MPH, director of pain management at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center said, “Today’s pain specialists understand how the sensation of pain occurs — how the nervous system, including the spinal cord, interacts with the brain to create that sensation.

Insights into the neurotransmitter system — the chemical messengers that pass nerve signals — have opened the door for important new modes of chronic pain relief, he explains. In recent years, scientists have learned how to manipulate those chemical messengers to change the way they interact with the brain’s signals.

That’s led to use of antidepressants and other drugs that work with specific brain chemicals that affect emotions, and help with perception of pain. We now have a whole new host of medications that are very effective for chronic pain relief,” Gallagher tells WebMD. 

medtronicIn November of 2011 Medtronic Corporation the manufacturer of a wide variety of medical devices announced a new treatment for chronic pain. In a news release the Minnesota corporation said, “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved AdaptiveStim™ with RestoreSensor™ neurostimulation system, the first and only chronic pain treatment that harnesses motion sensor technology found in smart phones and computer gaming systems to provide effective pain relief and convenience by automatically adapting stimulation levels to the needs of people with chronic back and/or leg pain.

The news release went on to say, “Data from the U.S. RestoreSensor clinical trial demonstrate that the AdaptiveStim with RestoreSensor neurostimulator provides effective pain relief and convenience. At the end of the study, 86.5 percent of study participants with chronic pain, who were included in an intent-to-treat analysis (n=74), experienced somewhat better or much better pain relief with no loss of convenience, or somewhat more or much more convenience with no loss of pain relief, when the device’s AdaptiveStim technology was turned on, compared to a control period when the participants manually adjusted neurostimulation settings using a patient programmer. With AdaptiveStim, study participants reported functional improvements, including improved comfort during position changes (80.3 percent).”

Not to be outdone, Boston Scientific is also in the chronic boston scientificpain management business On April 12 of this year they announced, Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX) has received approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and is beginning a limited launch of the Precision Spectra Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) System.  The Precision Spectra System is the world’s first and only SCS system with Illumina 3D™ software and 32 contacts, and is designed to provide improved pain relief to a wide range of patients who suffer from chronic pain.

The news release added, “The Precision Spectra System represents a paradigm shift in spinal cord stimulation,” said Giancarlo Barolat, M.D., medical director of Barolat Neuroscience in Denver.  “The Illumina 3D Software is the first SCS programming technology based on advanced anatomical and scientific principles.  When combined with 32 contacts and four lead ports—twice that of any other SCS system—the Precision Spectra technology gives physicians more flexibility to customize therapy for patients.”  

Medications for Treating Pain

Cancer pain is often treated with one or more medications. If you have concerns about taking certain medication, discuss this with your health care provider and pharmacist. Ask about long-term medication usage and side effects, such as allergies, constipation, sedation, memory impairment or other reactions.

  • For mild pain: Medications such as acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may provide relief. Some of these drugs, such as ibuprofen or naproxen, can be purchased without a prescription.
  • For moderate pain: Medications that combine an opioid (sometimes called a narcotic) such as hydrocodone or oxycodone with acetaminophen or aspirin may be needed. Vicodin and Percocet are examples.
  • For severe pain: Medications that contain an opioid only (sometimes called a narcotic) such as morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl or methadone are usually needed. These narcotic medications may be given orally or intravenously (or sometimes both).
  • For bone pain: When associated with metastatic cancer treatment for bone pain can include bone-strengthening steroid medication known as bisphosphonates. (Radiation therapy and surgery may also be very effective in relieving symptoms.)
  • Antidepressants medications: Amitriptyline and duloxetine, for example, can be very helpful in managing chronic pain.
  • Gabapentin and pregabalin: Originally developed to treat epilepsy, these can also be used for chronic pain, including neuropathic pain caused by nerve injury.
  • Topical anesthetics: Lidocaine pain patches, for example, may be helpful in some cases.

Complementary Pain Relief Options

Complementary (also called alternative or holistic medicine) treatments include massage, acupuncture, meditation, biofeedback or hypnosis. For some types of pain, heating pads, hot or cold packs and massage may be soothing and can help to reduce pain.

A health care provider may recommend counseling to help a patient cope with their pain or other distressing symptoms. Stress can make pain worse. It can also lessen the effect of pain management medications.

To learn more about these types of therapies, contact the National Cancer Institute. Talk with your health care team if you are interested in adding a complementary method of treatment. Let them know about supplements and herbs you want to try. Some types of complementary treatments can interfere with treatments prescribed by your provider.

Stem Cell Therapy

While there is a great deal of anecdotal evidence that stem cell therapy has beneficial applications there is little real medical evidence and many researchers, physicians and regulators still view much of stem cell therapy as modern day quackery.

I know you can find many people who have had stem cell therapy and swear by it but to the medical community that is still anecdotal evidence unsupported by clinical studies and therefore “iffy” or even dangerous.  It is important to note that even among physicians who are among the most trusted members of our society, there are those whose greed supersedes professional ethics.  These charlatans prey on a trusting public and can do more harm than good.  An example is the FDA and DEA crackdown on hundreds of physicians who indiscriminately prescribe controlled substances to anyone who wants them.  The best advice always is, “Buyer beware!”

In researching the subject for this blog I was struck again and again by conflicting opinions which convinced me that it is nearly impossible for a lay person like me to sort out the science from the pseudo-science and offer sound advice. I am simply not qualified to do so which means the burden falls back on the reader and depends on the illness in question, its severity and what has been done to treat it in the past.

I can only suggest this.  There are claims being made by clinics all over the world about successful stem cell therapies covering everything from bad knees to multiple sclerosis.  If you are seeking such therapy start out by talking to your primary care physician and getting his/her advice.  If still not satisfied look for a respected specialist in the field at a major medical center and finally if you still need more information, look up a highly respected medical school that also does research into stem cell therapy and inquire with them about your concerns.  I would avoid calling the stem cell clinics that sell the treatment because there is no way you will get an objective response from them.

In December of 2012 I published a blog on the issue of stem cell therapy titled Stem Cell Therapy – Some Truth, lots of Snake Oil.

I spent a considerable amount of time researching the issue before posting and little has changed since then.  If Stem Cell therapy is a consideration for you please read it and click on the many links I have provided.  They may not give you the answers you want but they will give you objective and accurate information.  Ultimately the decision is yours and yours alone. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is still struggling with the stem cell issue and until they can sort it all out I would proceed with great caution.

As you can gather, there’s a lot of confusion and misleading information about stem cell therapy because research is really in its infancy.  The International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) has a lot of information about stem cells and lists 10 things you should know about the subject on this link

Here is just one of the ten.

4.  Just because people say stem cells helped them doesn’t mean they did.

There are three main reasons why a person might feel better that are unrelated to the actual stem cell treatment: the ‘placebo effect’, accompanying treatments, and natural fluctuations of the disease or condition.

The intense desire or belief that a treatment will work can cause a person to feel like it has and to even experience positive physical changes, such as improved movement or less pain. This phenomenon is called the placebo effect. Even having a positive conversation with a doctor can cause a person to feel improvement. Likewise, other techniques offered along with stem cell treatment—such as changes to diet, relaxation, physical therapy, medication, etc.—may make a person feel better in a way that is unrelated to the stem cells. Also, the severity of symptoms of many conditions can change over time, resulting in either temporary improvement or decline, which can complicate the interpretation of the effectiveness of treatments.

These factors are so widespread that without testing in a controlled clinical study, where a group that receives a treatment is carefully compared against a group that does not receive this treatment, it is very difficult to determine the real effect of any therapy. Be wary of clinics that measure or advertise their results primarily through patient testimonials.

ISSCR offers a great deal more information on stem cell research and therapy on their home site at

Finally, Forbes magazine, admittedly very conservative in its approach to almost anything, ran this story about stem cells here’s an excerpt and a link.

Forbes excerpt

“The question for us as a society is when something done at the edge of clinical care becomes something we want to study,” Scott observed. “My feeling is that in many cases clinics are scrambling to get approval, but don’t have the gravitas that the clinical literature provides that would give comfort to a regulatory agency or even an advisory board to say ‘go ahead and do it.’ So until we have a better idea of what the adverse effects would be, these things are moving too quickly.”

Other Pain Treatment Options

Biofeedback is a method that uses the mind to help with pain. Breathing exercises, relaxation techniques, yoga, tai chi, qigong, visualization, meditation or guided imagery exercises may also be effective. Sometimes, talking with friends, laughing or listening to music can offer a helpful distraction from pain.

For severe pain, a technique called a nerve block is sometimes considered. This procedure may involve injecting a substance directly into or around a nerve or around the spinal cord. These procedures block damaged nerves from sending pain signals to the brain so that the pain will not be felt. Nerve blocks may work to control pain for people who have advanced cancer or very painful nerve conditions. However, there can be serious complications associated with these procedures.

Talk with your health care provider about the benefits and risks before any treatment to decide what is best for your situation. Every survivor responds differently to pain management strategies. Open communication with your health care team can help you decide together what will work best to manage your pain.


After considerable research Bob’s Newheart has come to the conclusion that while there are forces at play that would deny patients relief from chronic pain, there is also help available.  Unfortunately the medical profession is more a part of the problem than the solution despite its protestations to the contrary.  For any doctor to deny relief to a patient with legitimate pain is to us a violation of their oath. 

Chronic pain is a medical reality that affects not only the body but the emotional stability of the patient as well.  Any patient who says, “I cannot go on living like this,” and is denied relief for fear of being investigated is in desperate straits.  When my pain specialist said to me, “I can’t give you narcotics, see your primary,” he was not only lying he was telling me he didn’t’ care about my pain.

Narcotics or controlled substances aren’t always the proper treatment but neither is denying these drugs to people who are in legitimate pain. 


bob minus Jay full shotBob Aronson is a 2007 heart transplant recipient.  He is the founder of Facebook’s 3000 plus member Organ Transplant Initiative (OTI) and the author of most of these Bob’s Newheart Blogs. 

All that’s required to join OTI is that you support our mission and follow the rules for the group.  You can read about both in the “About” section on the right side of the OTI group page.




%d bloggers like this: